CUT THE CRAP: Movie review of Joon-ho Bong’s Snowpiercer by Howard Casner

First, a word from our sponsors. Ever wonder what a reader for a contest or agency thinks when he reads your screenplay? Check out my new e-book published on Amazon: Rantings and Ravings of a Screenplay Reader, including my series of essays, What I Learned Reading for Contests This Year, and my film reviews of 2013. Only $2.99.


snowpiercerThere is one clever and rather effective scene in Snowpiercer, the new movie about a train containing all the survivors of a global warming apocalyptic event that travels the world and can never stop.

Just as a battle royale is about to erupt, everyone is ordered to stop and wait while some of the participants count down from ten as the train passes over a certain bridge, a bridge the train passes over only once annually, meaning that it’s, wait for it…yes, New Years.

Once the countdown is over, it’s back to the bloodshed.

But outside of that, I’m sorry, but I have to say…no, you know what? I’m not sorry.

Snowpiercer is crap.


How crappy is it?


Even for crap, it’s crap.


It’s crap from the tail to the engine.


It is pure, uncut, 100% unadulterated crap.


If you looked up “crap” in the OED, the picture next to the definition would be of Snowpiercer.


I mean, it’s so crappy, it made me do the unthinkable: feel empathy for producer Harvey Weinstein who wanted to take the movie out of the director’s hands and recut and shorten it (until I realized that even if Weinstein did that, it wouldn’t have helped, it would still be crap).


And I don’t care if it has earned a 97% rating on among the top critics (who should know better and should be ashamed of themselves). It’s crap.


And I don’t care how much money it’s raked in at the box office so far. It’s crap.


And I don’t care if all my friends/acquaintances/enemies gang up on me on social media and call me an idiot (get in line). It’s crap.


Oh, BTW, did I happen to mention that Snowpiercer is crap? Well, if I didn’t, let me say it loud and clear, here and now, Snowpiercer is crap.


The direction is by Joon-ho Bong, the great South Korean filmmaker of Memories of Murder, Mother and The Host.


But as far as I’m concerned, with this new piece of cinematic celluloid, he’s now the latest example of what happens when a talented foreign director comes to the U.S. to make a film: after making a successful and/or attention getting movie in their own country, they are punished for their sins by being given, well, I won’t say crap, so let us say material that is, oh, somewhat beneath them to direct.


We’ve had John (Hard Boiled, A Better Tomorrow, Bullet in the Head) Woo getting Hard Target and a Mission Impossible movie; Denis (Incendies) Villeneuve getting Prisoners; Tom (Run, Lola, Run) Twyker getting Perfume: The Story of a Murderer, The International and Cloud Atlas; Chan-wook (Oldboy, Thirst) Park getting Stoker; Neill (District 9) Blomkamp getting Elysium.


Of course, I’m exaggerating. Other directors have fared a bit better (Nicolas Winding Refn). Though I think Jean Luc Godard said it all when he took the money from his American backers and made Contempt


But still, I do feel that whenever a foreign director crosses the shores (or borders), they, more often than not, end up doing some script that some producer just happened to have laying around in some drawer (to paraphrase Michael Hanake).


And the movies that result are usually crap.


And Snowpiercer is no exception.


Of course, as far as I know, this is all on Boon (and Woo, Villeneuve, et al. as well). As far as I know, this was his project, his baby, from the very beginning and he has no one but himself to blame. I can’t argue that. It just seems odd that the very first movie he makes in the English language is, like all the others I mentioned, well, crap, and not just crap, but crappity crap crap crap.


Snowpiercer is what is called a metaphor.   Like District 9 really being about immigration and Elysium really being about universal health care, Snowpiercer is not about what it is about. At the same time, what it is supposed be about, what it’s supposed to be a metaphor for, is something I’m a bit cloudy on, mainly because it seems to change its target from moment to moment and train car to train car.


It starts out as a story that reflects class differences and the widening economic gap of the 99%/1% (though it seems to reflect Medieval serfdom or the state of things just before the French and Russian revolution more than modern America) and ends as…well, hell if I know. But whatever it is, at that point it basically seems to be saying that all of humanity; the rich, the poor; the have, the have nots; the saints, the sinners, are all so worthless, they should all be sent to hell.


It seems an odd journey for a director and writer to take (the screenplay is by Kelly Masterson and Bong, based upon a graphic novel, which, from what I can tell, has a plot that seems to bear very little to any resemblance to the story Bong came up with here), to go from sympathy with the poor and disenfranchised to saying, eh, a plague on both your houses, let ‘em all die, the world’s better off without humans in it at all.


And the ending is even more puzzling. After lots of violence and sleep inducing, shallow philosophical and political talk (mainly from Wilford, the creator of the train, played by Ed Harris, though his playing god is not as interesting this time around as it was in The Truman Show), two people are left alive: a teenage girl and an even younger boy.


But this final scene is directed as if their survival is a sign of hope, of promise, of a chance for a new future. But, no, people, no.


Bong and Masterson may think that these two survivors are the future of humanity, but in reality they are the last of it. You can’t repopulate the world with only two people (or if you try, I’d hate to think how it would all turn out—you know, those pesky and annoying genetic issues brought about by inbreeding?).


The beginning is no better. It basically opens in the middle of act one, which means that a lot of clunky dialog and unclear plot devices have to be introduced in order to get the story going.


And after that, nothing in the movie makes much sense, even in the context of a comic book type story in which realism and logic aren’t necessarily what everyone is striving for. One of the more ridiculous revelations is that of a series of late night calls that went on for hours between someone in the tail of the train with someone at the head—just how this person could do this for eighteen years and never get caught is just a bit on the preposterous side.


Perhaps the most puzzling aspect of the story is that no one in the tail section ever asks the most obvious question: why are they kept alive? They serve no purpose; they never work (there does seem to be some sort of small middle class cooking, farming, bartending types along the way, though like in Fritz Lang’s Metropolis, it’s unclear exactly where this class lives or how this part works, but it’s definitely not in the tail); none of these unfortunates contribute in any way. But for some reason, that no one ever questions, they are allowed to exist.


But Boon and Masterson are trapped here. They can’t ask the question, because if they do, then the audience will start to wonder and will subsequently guess one of the twists at the end. The problem, though, is that because none of the characters asked, I did, and, quickly sensing that the writers were trying to hide something, I quite easily figured out what was going on.


And then when the other big secret is revealed, the disclosure as to who has been sending the hero coded messages and why, all I could think was, are you telling me that Wilford went to all this trouble to achieve something that could have been achieved with far less activity and danger to anyone, especially to the existence of the train? Really? I mean, really?


Okay. Whatever.


Besides being flat and uninteresting (and clunky), the dialog also has a couple of excuse me moments, as well.   At one point, Curtis, our hero (Chris Evans) and best friend Edgar (Jamie Bell) are confronted by a car full of masked men with axes and other sharp edged weapons. Curtis tells Edgar, “be careful”, and I turned to my friend and whispered, “As opposed to what”?


At another moment, the group has stopped their warfare to have sushi (no, I’m not making this up) with Mason, the go-between between the tail and the engine (a bucked tooth Tilda Swinton who is bucked toothed because…, well, I guess because everyone involved thinks that buck tooth people are inherently funny).   When Mason says that they only have sushi twice a year and can anyone guess why, Tanya (Octavia Spencer), one of the tail members, says “not enough fish”. Mason says, no, that it’s because it’s the only way to keep a balance between humans and fish so that the fish can survive…so, in other words, not enough fish.


Boon also can’t settle on a tone. Half the time, it’s deadly serious, the other half it’s high camp satire (especially whenever Mason is on the scene) and these two extremes just never fit together.


The acting ranges from mediocre (John Hurt, Bell, Spencer, Harris, Boon fave Kang-ho Song) to execrable (Swinton, who most of the time seems to be in a Monty Python skit). In the defense of the actors, they don’t really have a lot to work with here. And poor Chris Evans. He’s not a great actor; I can’t say he’s even a very good actor. But I doubt even Laurence Olivier could have pulled off that embarrassing monologue he has to deliver at the end.


The best performance is probably given by Vladimir Ivanov, the remarkable Romanian actor of such movies as 4 Months, 3 Weeks, 2 Days and Police, Adjective, who says almost nothing as a silent killing machine who just won’t die.


And I do have to say, from a technical standpoint, Snowpiercer is a marvel with a remarkable sets, costumes, makeup and cinematography.


But still, outside of that, Snowpiercer is crap.

26 Comments on “CUT THE CRAP: Movie review of Joon-ho Bong’s Snowpiercer by Howard Casner”

  1. Craig says:

    I completely agree with this review. I couldn’t stop laughing at Tilda Swinton. Was she channeling her inner Gary Oldman from the Fifth Element? The only survivors of a man made “ice age” were on a train and not in bunkers underground near geothermal energy sources? This movie was pure garbage and I have no idea why it has so many positive reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. Something must be in the water.

  2. Luke M says:

    I’m so happy that someone else understands me! There was so many holes in the plot and facts that I was shocked when I checked Rotten tomatoes. Wtf. Srsly.

    I’d rate this movie 1/10 for nice work with the sets.

  3. Clicymn says:

    Holmberg C, Waters EA, Whitehouse K, Daly M, McCaskill Stevens W stromectol purchase

  4. Playept says:

    For each hospital contact, one primary and optional secondary diagnoses are registered according to the International Classification of Diseases ICD 5 mg tamoxifen study For the DGE analysis, the count of the tags represents the gene expression level; that is, the higher the tag count, the higher the expression level

  5. Burcisk says:

    Yang MX, Shenoy B, Disttler M, Patel R, McGrath M, Pechenov S, Margolin AL half life doxycycline

  6. Burcisk says:

    doxycycline 100mg side effects 4, ALT increased 12 vs 6, AST increased 12 vs 5, dizziness 11 vs 7, rash 11 vs 4

  7. Bluesetum says:

    propecia results Collectively, these data suggest that existing cysts locally confer susceptibility for new cyst formation in their vicinity

  8. InessaSamt says:

    coursework writing services
    creative writing coursework
    coursework research

  9. estance says:

    where can i buy priligy online safely SOFT did not meet its primary endpoint of improvement in 5 year disease free survival at a median follow up of 5

  10. Toorsedof says:

    levonorgestrel ethinyl estradiol dosage Details of the charge against Wallace Гў long term affects of kamagra

  11. pymnskamy says:

    tamoxifen class It will take it towards autocratic regimes

  12. Breabbark says:

    Cumiskey J, Whyte P, Kelehan P, Gibbons D 2008 A detailed morphologic and immunohistochemical comparison of pre and postmenopausal endometriosis viagra and alcohol reddit Taking advantage of the NSABP paraffin archive of tissue blocks from patients treated on numerous clinical trials, several studies have been performed to evaluate the performance of the RS in predicting distant recurrence free survival in node negative, ER positive breast cancers

  13. shoospiny says:

    They themselves scared other countries, he said ivermectin for dogs Sonawalla, S

  14. shoospiny says:

    The index was a combination of self report and physician ratings; it omitted measures of vaginal dryness and loss of libido; no demographic data of the sample were given; weighting was used without statistical justification; terms were ill defined; categories included overlapping scores, and most importantly scores were summed without being based on independent factors cialis for sale online

  15. Toorsedof says:

    Alicia Belgorosky, in Encyclopedia of Endocrine Diseases Second Edition, 2019 buy viagra online in india Men who are experiencing man boobs gynecomastia which are linked with usage of anabolic steroids sometimes take higher dosages, such as two and half milligrams per day

  16. arronry says:

    Right now I m feeling the guilt but I keep reminding myself that I did it because I loved her so much because I didn t want her to suffer anymore and I know that s exactly why you did what you did azithromycin z pack

  17. alkarma says:

    Each person is different and not all medicines are safe, especially among children, pregnant or breastfeeding women, and the elderly buying cialis online

  18. arronry says:

    de Oliveira Dias JR, et al cialis from india MRP5 has been reported to contribute to the transport of cyclic nucleotides, nucleotide analogs, organic dyes, GSH, and glucuronide and sulfate conjugated steroids Table 3 Borst and Elferink, 2002; Borst et al

  19. alkarma says:

    Rickles FR, Varga E, Brownstein A what is female viagra

  20. addindy says:

    stromectol tablets for humans 5 mg month given intramuscularly for 1 to 6 months

  21. Shiliamum says:

    In Mexico new born babies receiving star anise tea for treatment of abdominal cramps, subsequently suffered tonic clonic seizures best price cialis 20mg

  22. Shiliamum says:

    tadalista vs cialis Sharing your symptoms, how long they lasted and what made them better or worse, with your doctor can help them decide on ways to manage any side effects you may be experiencing

  23. Infofedex says:

    The majority of patients are adequately maintained with fentanyl transdermal system administered every 72 hours generic cialis no prescription With this therapeutic approach, mPFS was rather similar 8

  24. soyloandy says:

    buy cialis and viagra online karoupkov, P; Hwang, S H; Hammock, B D; Imig, J D; Sadowski, J Physiological research Academia Scientiarum Bohemoslovaca 26047375 Enhancing bottom up and top down proteomic measurements with ion mobility separations

  25. XPheRNhEO says:

    Tinnitus severity score by age group image courtesy 7 generic cialis for sale In general, physicians should caution against driving if the seizures are not controlled and involve impairment of consciousness or motor function

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *